Appellant, McCaffrey’s, Inc., cravings that question of Russell v. Palentine Inches. , 106 Miss. 290, 301, 63 Thus. 644, 646, 51 L.R.A. (N. Underneath the items therefore we told you:
„Will be i keep you to appellee (grasp and you may boss) are accountable for the fresh acts off Klein (slave and staff), it might be to hold, when an expert to gather a loans try shown, regulations commonly suggest the legal right to *414 institute unlawful proceedings from the debtor in the event your borrower fails or will not spend. We do not believe that that is sound for the reasoning or in-law.“
From the immediate instance, i neither concern that it laws away from laws because the launched because instance underneath the circumstances therein, neither will we restrict or extend their procedure. It really isn’t medical and you can managing in the event on bar due to the fact right here we do not suggest the latest authority of the appellant, McCaffrey, Inc., so you’re able to institute violent process. Their manager, Mrs. Ingram, the change ego, met with the power in order to institute unlawful procedures, and that expert are exercised. It absolutely was a lot of, as record reveals, to possess a conference of one’s Board off Administrators away from appellant, McCaffrey’s, Inc., getting held, and you may an answer bequeath on new minutes of said firm, permitting the new criminal proceeding.